REVIEW: WesleyGibson's Thoughts On GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE (2024)

Everyone wanted a darker Ghost Rider than what Mark Steven Johnson produced with the original film, then there came the trailer to the sequel/reboot directed by Crank Directors Brian Taylor and Mark Neveldine which promised that. Did it keep its promise or completely fail? Click for my take...

REVIEW: WesleyGibson's Thoughts On GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE (1)


The first Ghost Rider was surely no great film, with bad acting, cheesy dialogue, and hardly no action. I really got into the rider and he became one of my favorite characters very quickly, and after the failure of the first film I still wanted more Ghost Rider, but with at least, a darker tone. Upon finding out that the Crank Directors Neveldine/Taylor would helm the sequel/reboot which promised a darker and more supernatural tone, I was happy. I thought that maybe they could do the character justice, and I always felt that such a kick-ass character could carry his own film, he just needs that certain push.

The first trailer for the film arrived and I have to admit, I was very impressed, and hell I believed that we were going to have a film that would portray the rider the way he's supposed to be. However, many people were still skeptic to the film, but I supported the idea of it 100%, and I always liked Nic Cage as an actor, so I didn't mind him returning. I know the the majority of the CBM family here likes to shun Cage, and would have wanted a fresh actor for the rider, but that's not how it turned out and we just have to accept that.

On to the reviews. Overly negative with a side of bashing the film at every turn. Some even said the film was worse than the first, and than my support for the film started to fade very quickly. I loved the character, and I love how he looked in this film, but knowing that that was probably the only strong point was really hard to stay behind. I still retained some interest in it and thought that it could still be something at least worth giving one watch, so having said that, me and my wife decided to give it a chance.

Well in my honest view of the film, I have to say that it's better than the first. The film surprised me at some parts, and the movie's best strong point was Ghost Rider (although that'd make sense wouldn't it?). The first part of the film started out very weak and was very hard to watch because of the style of directing. The beginning was a crazy headache of a mess but when the rest came, it did get a little better. The camera seemed to calm down, and things got easier to put more focus into.

Nicolas Cage as Blaze could have and probably should have been portrayed by someone else, but as stated before, that didn't happen. So having said that, there were parts that he over-acted, but he mostly fit the part well. He was crazy and really brought out that Cage complex that many people can't stand today, so if you hate that about Cage, you'll hate this film no matter what. The kid and the woman were slightly on the annoying side, Idris Elba was a highlight of the film, and Johnny Witworth as the villain Blackout was actually easy to watch (way better than Wes Bentley's ridiculously cheesy Blackheart), and I think he did well in avoiding those old villain cliches that seem to plague almost every villainous performance in film. Christopher Lambert was great as always, and I was glad to see him.

The action in the film was about as absent as it was in the first, with maybe little improvement. Even though more stylish, it didn't really seem to help. Ghost Rider in action however was the best part or parts of the whole damn film, and I must say, they did a great job portraying him on-screen. He did look damn cool and was actually creepy, making him more fun to watch than in the first.

CLOSING STATEMENTS: With mostly annoying acting, shaky scenes and hammy dialogue, the film is certainly no masterpiece and is no where near it. The film however, does have a solid middle and end, and Ghost Rider packs one helluva meaner punch than whatever Mark Steven Johnson was trying to accomplish in the first. If you do not like Nic Cage, than this film isn't for you at all, and I will be honest with you, the film does take an open mind to watch, as well as a love for the character in the first place. In comparing this film to the first, I will say that I fall into that very small majority that thinks it's a better portrayal than what the first had.


My Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars.

REVIEW: WesleyGibson's Thoughts On GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE (2)


DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions. This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies. [LESS]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

REVIEW: WesleyGibson's Thoughts On GHOST RIDER: SPIRIT OF VENGEANCE (2024)

FAQs

Which of the following aspects of a realistic approach to film relate to form and which relate to content? ›

Final answer: In a realistic approach to film, aspects related to form include cinematography, editing, and sound design, while aspects related to content encompass storytelling, themes, and character development.

Who directed the 2018 film A Quiet Place? ›

A Quiet Place is a 2018 American post-apocalyptic horror film directed by John Krasinski. The screenplay was written by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods from a story they conceived, with contributions by Krasinski after he joined the project.

What are the 4 approaches to film analysis? ›

Film analysis is guided by various approaches, and the four traditional approaches to film history include: aesthetic, technological, economic, and social-historical. The aesthetic approach to film history focuses on the senses and that which you can see and hear. The film is viewed as a work of art.

What does realism in film emphasize? ›

Realism in film and TV is an approach that seeks to portray life without excessive stylization or dramatization. It's an attempt to capture the mundane, the ordinary, and the authentic aspects of human existence and hopefully make them entertaining and meaningful to the audience.

What is the main message of A Quiet Place? ›

A Quiet Place highlighted Lee and Evelyn's kids as needing protection, but also their need to protect each other. A Quiet Place II expands upon this theme of the children rising up to take charge and protect their parents as well.

What is the summary of The Quiet Place? ›

Who is actually deaf in A Quiet Place? ›

Millicent Simmonds (born March 6, 2003) is a deaf American actress who starred in the 2018 horror film A Quiet Place and its 2020 sequel A Quiet Place Part II. Her breakout role was in the 2017 drama film Wonderstruck. For Wonderstruck and A Quiet Place, she was nominated for several awards for best youth performance.

What is the relationship between form and content in film? ›

The form of a movie encompasses the various technical elements, such as cinematography, sound, editing, and mise-en-scène, which contribute to the way a story is told. On the other hand, content refers to the movie's narrative, themes, ideas, and emotional dynamics that the story intends to convey.

What are the characteristics of a realistic film? ›

In films that excel in realism, viewers often find the characters relatable and the situations believable. The dialogues aren't forced or overly dramatic; they mirror the way people actually speak. The settings are chosen for their real-world resemblance rather than their aesthetic appeal.

What type of filmmaking approach focuses on form and content? ›

Formalism. Formalist Film Theory looks at the technical aspects of film — shots, editing, lighting, sound. Thus, formalists are concerned about how these elements work (or do not work) to create impact on the viewer. Simply put, formalism focuses heavily on how the style of a production communicates an intended message ...

Which elements of film are related to form and which are related to content? ›

In summary, elements like lighting, costumes, and sound fall under form as they relate to the technical and aesthetic presentation of the film, while elements like the movie's genre, plot development, and character focus fall under content as they are related to the narrative and thematic aspects of the film.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Patricia Veum II

Last Updated:

Views: 6484

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Patricia Veum II

Birthday: 1994-12-16

Address: 2064 Little Summit, Goldieton, MS 97651-0862

Phone: +6873952696715

Job: Principal Officer

Hobby: Rafting, Cabaret, Candle making, Jigsaw puzzles, Inline skating, Magic, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Patricia Veum II, I am a vast, combative, smiling, famous, inexpensive, zealous, sparkling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.